Note: This Is Part 3 of a 3-Part Series written with Sam Bennett and Allison Zmuda. If you missed either of the earlier posts, you can find them here: Post 1: The Plan Isn’t the Point | Post 2: From Slogans to Stances – Beliefs That Do Real Work. Make sure you read those first, and come back to this one later!

In Post 1, we asked what is at stake when a school community sits down to revise its plans — and made the case that the goal is not the plan itself but the foundational beliefs underneath it. In Post 2, we looked at what makes a belief actually useful: it can be tested against practice, it takes a stance someone could push on, and it invites the kind of friction that lets lived experience reshape what we do.

This third post turns toward the place where that work usually gets stuck: the small sentences people say in passing, often with conviction, that close down what is possible before planning even starts. They sometimes sound like wisdom. They sometimes sound like certainty, experience, or hard-won realism. But they are limiting the work — narrowing what we plan for, who we plan for, and what we believe a class period can hold.

We want to suggest a different way to hear them. Not as red lights, as if a colleague has crossed a line. Not as green lights, where we drive past without slowing down. But as flashing yellow lights. Signals. Information. Places where a real learning belief is either missing, under pressure, or not yet holding.

Self-Assessments vs. Learning Beliefs: What’s the Difference?

It helps, here, to name a distinction we have been circling.

A self-assessment is a claim a person makes about themselves: “I can’t do art.” “I’m not a math person.” “I can’t write.” Many of the learners we serve walk in carrying these claims. So do many of the adults. Held deeply enough, a self-assessment becomes an identity statement.

A learning belief is something different — it is a claim about how learning works. And here is the move that matters: a learning belief can change a self-assessment. If we hold the belief that struggle is where learning happens, or that every learner arrives with assets worth building on, then “I can’t do art” stops being a fixed fact and become a starting point.

But these claims do not only show up in students. They show up in faculty rooms, in leadership meetings, in the language of a whole building — and they do not always sound like statements about a single person. Sometimes they sound like claims about a whole group of learners, or about the realities of teaching, or about what is possible inside a school day. These are the yellow lights.

What Yellow Lights Sound Like in a Real School

Here are some we have heard, set against the can-do conditions they tend to displace:

Claims that inhibit learning	Can-do conditions
“These kids don’t do anything.”	Every learner arrives with something to build on. Our job is to find it and design from there.
“I’m not here to entertain them.”	Engagement is not entertainment. It is the difference between a learner reaching for the work and waiting for it to end.
“Planning for engagement takes too much time.”	Planning for engagement is planning. The alternative is planning to manage disengagement, which costs more.
“The ‘low’ kids will never be able to do this.”	There is no such thing as a “low” human. There are learners we have not yet reached, and designs we have not yet tried.
“Kids don’t read anything that isn’t on their phone.”	Students need to uncover who they are as readers and compelling reasons to read. Teachers can create the conditions for that discovery.
“I don’t have time to find lots of text choices.”	With multiple access points, all readers can get better at reading. The better they become at reading, the more they will like it.
“I can’t manage that.”	Management follows design. When the work is clear and the roles are real, the room organizes around the learning.

The point is not that the left column is wrong and the right column is right. It is that each statement on the left is doing something — narrowing what we plan for, who we plan for, and what we believe is possible during a class period.  And each can-do condition on the right is doing something too. It opens a door. It names a belief about learners that lets us design differently.

What to Do When You Hear One

So what do we actually do when a yellow light flashes — in our own thinking, or in the language of a colleague?

• We slow down before we react. A yellow light is not an accusation. It is information. The sentence is telling us where a real learning belief is missing, or under pressure, or hasn’t yet been built together. That is useful to know.

• We get curious before we correct. The teacher who says “these kids don’t do anything” may be exhausted, or grieving a class that didn’t go the way they hoped, or working without the conditions that would let any human do their best work. The claim is real, even if the conclusion isn’t useful. We have to be able to hear it before we can help move it.

• We name the belief underneath. Every claim points at one. “Planning for engagement takes too much time” rests on a belief about what planning is for, what engagement is, and what the school day can hold. We can ask, gently: what would have to be true for that sentence to feel different on a Tuesday in February?

• We bring the work back to the table. This is where Posts 1 and 2 come home. A faculty that has done the slow work of identifying, clarifying, and curating its useful beliefs has something to come back to when a yellow light flashes. The belief is on the wall, in the document, in the shared language. It does not erase the claim. But it gives the claim somewhere to be tested.

Questions to Carry With You

A few questions to carry with you:

• Think about a recent moment you felt prickly and not in alignment with your values. What belief was doing the work underneath it? Is it one you would write down?

• Where do you feel stuck as a leader of learning right now? Do you need more time, more information, or an honest conversation before a real belief can take shape?

• Who would you want to sit in this work with — to wrestle with the slogans, the stances, and the yellow lights together?

This is the story we want to tell about the learners in our care, and about the educators who serve them. That every day matters. That the can-do conditions can be built and tended. That partnership and agency are not slogans but design choices we make over and over again. That a tired sentence in a hallway is not the end of a conversation — it is, sometimes, the beginning of one.

Where we are heading. This series is the first of several conversations the three of us are having out loud. Beliefs are where the work begins, but they are not where it lives. In our next collaborative venture, we turn to the practice of curriculum storyboards — the design work that translates what we believe about learners, for students and for educators, into something we can plan from on a Tuesday in February. We hope you’ll stay with us.

Want to Do This Work With Your School?

If this series has given your team something worth wrestling with, Cris works directly with schools to build the conditions where beliefs like these don’t just live in a document — they shape what happens in classrooms every day. Through workshops, Literacy Labs, 1:1 and small group coaching, and personalized Zooms, she meets schools where they are and helps move the work forward. To start the conversation, fill out her contact form or reach out to her directly by email at TovaniCris@gmai.com